Jesus Christ; “Neither Killed Nor Crucified”, Not Even Touched. (Part 2)


By Dr. Mohiuddin Waseem

AbrahamicFaiths@hotmail.com

 


In the name of Allah most gracious and most merciful.

“Proclaim (or Read) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created-- Created man out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood. Proclaim! And thy Lord is most bountiful-- He who taught (the use of) the pen--Taught man that which he knew not” (Holy Quran 96; 1-5).

These are the first few verses of Holy Quran, revealed to Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) from God Almighty when he was given the responsibility of delivering the last and final message of God to the world. Note that from the very beginning, the Islamic call stressed the need to read and understand the divine message on the basis of God’s given reasoning and intellect. This is precisely the reason that the Muslim community from its earliest days produced such scholarship that not only the Holy Quran was preserved but also the sayings and traditions of Prophet Mohammad (hadiths) in separate books. Thousands of the prophet’s companions made it possible that God’s call and the teachings of the prophet are delivered to as many people as possible. Within the first two hundred years of the prophet’s demise Muslims developed the sciences of critical evaluation of the scriptures which was never heard of in any religion of the world. The typical Muslim mentality which grew out of  Quranic teachings and the prophet’s preaching is to search the authenticity and then to analyze on rational grounds any claim made to them before accepting it’s authority.

Unfortunately the situation is very different for Judeo-Christian literature specially Christology which is the topic of discussion. It is only in the last two hundred years of our era that critical biblical scholarship has emerged and revealed the shocking reality that during the first 4th to 5th century the Christian Church was too busy formulating the concept of Trinity and it seems that no one had time or interest to search for the true ‘Gospel of Jesus’ which he himself taught when confronting and preaching the Jews of his time.

The oldest manuscripts of New Testament famously known as Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus and Codex Alexandrinus all date around 4th-5th century, containing the letters of Paul (? 50-60 A.D), Gospels of Mark (? 75 A.D), Matthew (? 85-90 A.D), Luke/Acts (? 85-90 A.D) and John (? 95-125 A.D) all “supposed” to have written between 50-150 A.D, telling and retelling an old song known to the pagans that ‘a divine savior has been crucified, died and resurrected for the sins of the world’. None of the writers of this alleged ‘passion- resurrection narrative’, are eye witnesses to the event and the oldest writer Paul never saw, met or touched Jesus while he walked on this earth.

There is a massive scholarly consensus that Mark might have originated independently where as Luke and Matthew copied whole sale from Mark (synoptic gospels); as for John he is independent of the synoptics for the miracles and sayings of Jesus but not for the passion and resurrection stories. These scholars tell us that Matthew and Luke also consulted another major work (Q Gospel,?50 A.D) along with Mark to finalize their account of gospels yet there is not a single hint about any passion-resurrection story from “Q Gospel”. Similarly the recently discovered “Gospel of Thomas” unearthed in 1945 near Nag Hammadi in Egypt, shows no knowledge of crucifixion of Jesus but consists exclusively of sayings, parables, and dialogues of Jesus. It reads, “The followers said to Jesus: “We know that you are going to leave us. Who will be our leader?” Jesus said to them: “No matter where you are, you are to go to James the Just, for whose sake heaven and earth came into being” (Thomas 12).

Here again you find Jesus and his disciples reflecting the knowledge of his future ascension and his disciples are concerned about the future leadership of the true Christian community knowing that he is not going to come back in the near future, otherwise the logical answer from Jesus would have been that ‘ why do you worry! We have lots of time. I am not leaving till I am crucified and raised to the life again and dwelt among you for another forty days from that event’, rather you find Jesus expressing his will in favour of James (his brother) in anticipation of his imminent ascension which was about to happen at any moment.

In conclusion the Christian communities of ‘Q Gospel’ and ‘Gospel of Thomas’ had no knowledge of trial, crucifixion, death and resurrection myth and it naturally follows that their ‘faith’ did not rest on these details at all. The myth of crucifixion was created by Paul, who is the most Jew friendly among the New Testament writers and the first to affirm the Jewish claim (Talmud) that Jesus Christ has been crucified, when the fact of the matter is that despite all the evil intension the Jews (of Christ’s time) had they were not able to touch this mighty messenger of God.

The Holy Quran depicts a scene from the Day of Reckoning when God will have a discourse with Jesus and tells how God saved him; it says, “Than will Allah say: “O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favour to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy sprit (Angel Gabriel), so that thou didst speak to the people in infancy and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book of Wisdom, The Law and the Gospel. And behold! Thou didst make out of clay the figure of a bird, By My leave, and thou didst breathe into it, and it becometh a bird by My leave, and thou didst heal those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold! I DID RESTRAIN THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL FROM (VIOLENCE TO) THEE when thou didst show them the clear signs, and the unbelievers among them said: ‘This is nothing but evident magic” (Holy Quran 5; 10).


When all is said and explained the Christian argument shifts towards historians like Pliny, Suetonius, Josephus and Tacitus. Among these four the first two tell us about Christians but not about Christ Jesus. Only Josephus (Antiquities 18.63-64; 90-95 A.D) and Tacitus (Annals 15.44; 115 A.D) tell us about Jesus or Christ and the continuation from him to Christianity. Even if we assume that their books are transmitted to us without being altered by Christian interpolations the fact remains that these writers were only quoting the Pauline version of Christology, which was by that time growing rapidly as the dominant sect of Christianity.