Jesus Christ: “Neither Killed Nor Crucified”, Not Even Touched. (Part 1)

 

By Dr. Mohiuddin Waseem

AbrahamicFaiths@hotmail.com

 

 

 

In The Name Of Allah, Most Gracious and Most Merciful.

The religion of the world can be broadly divided into Philosophical and Prophetic types. The Philosophical religions in principle are based on scientific observations of the nature and the universe which ultimately lead humanity to worship from male and female generative organs to astral deities to Geometric numbers and figures. In contrast to this the Prophetic religions taught a belief in a sole Creator of the cosmos variously known as Allah, Elli, Alu and Eloah in different Semitic languages of Middle East, the home land of Prophet Abraham.

 

From the very face value of this comparison it is evident that the Prophetic religions stressed that their source of information is through the revelation of God Almighty and left no room for Philosophers to creep into their territory with their various opinions and wild imaginations. This is precisely the reason why we find these Prophets at war with the Philosophical religions of their times. Several examples of this eternal conflict can be found in the pages of the Holy Quran and the Bible. Another intermediate group, which is neither fish nor fowl, are the mystics of ancient pagan world who in their quest for the knowledge of the God, relied heavily on spiritual hallucinations brought on by such methods as prolonged fasting, drugs and physical torments to name a few. This group passed its legacy to mystics of Christianity, Cabbalists of Judaism and Sufis of Islam.

 

With this background in mind scholars have approached Paul to understand his personality and message. Knowing this person has a paramount importance in Christian learning as more or less half of the New Testament books are attributed to him. The majority of current Biblical scholars hold the opinion that he was a Jewish Christian comparing to the charges of Gnostic (mystic) and Philosopher which he has been labeled with for some times.

 

But in my opinion he was a genius Jew with Political ambition, and that was to present his Jewish religion in such terms that it becomes acceptable and palatable to the non-Jewish nations surrounding his people in the land of Judea. According to Paul’s own letter, the people of Corinthians doubted him and “desire proof that Christ is speaking in me” and also that, “I was crafty, you say, and got the better of you by guile” (Holy Bible: RSV; 2 Corinthians 13 & 14). In the book of Romans (3; 7) Paul admits that he did not hesitate to use deceit in his conversion process with these words, “But if through my falsehood God’s truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner”? With his own confession it is clear to me that in the purest terms he was a politician, lead by the assumption that the end justifies the means; discrediting his own “lord and savior” Jesus Christ who taught that it is only the truth which lets anybody free (John 8; 32).

 

His ideology of “salvation related to a belief in death and resurrection of a divine savior” was in itself the dominating religious dogma known to the heathen nations of his times, as Paul himself admits that even well before he became a minister, “the gospel which you heard, which has been preached to every creature under heaven, and of which I, Paul became a minister” (Colossians 1; 23).

 

More than a dozen such saviors, are known to current biblical scholars, such as Krishna of India (1200 B.C), Thammuz of Syria (1160 B.C), Quexalcote of Mexico (587 B.C), Atys of Phyrygia (1170 B.C), Mithra of Persia and Budha of India (600 B.C) to name a few (The world’s sixteen crucified saviors; Kersey Graves; p 102- 133).

 

We know from Luke that Paul was born in Tarsus (Acts 21: 39; 22: 3), an important city of Cilicia in the modern south central Turkey. Hyam Maccoby rightly points out that, “ In Tarsus his education would have been with pagan children, and his imagination would have been impressed by the beautiful pagan ceremonies of mourning and joy associated with the death and resurrection of certain pagan gods worshipped in Tarsus”, (The Mythmaker; p 96- 97).

 

It was in this religious and cultural context that Jesus Christ was born miraculously as a sign from God Almighty revealing to these heathen nations in general and Jews in particular that a miraculous birth in itself does not qualify a divine status rather it is just like any other ordinary birth, with dependency on a mother to rear the baby before birth and breast feed and change the diapers afterwards, something which the God Almighty does not require.

 

The Holy Quran testifies to these facts in the these simple terms as follows:
“The similitude of Jesus before God is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said: “Be” and he was. The truth comes from thy Lord alone; so be not of those who doubt” (3: 59- 60).
“Christ, the son of Mary was no more than a messenger: many were the messengers that passed away before him, his mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how God doth make His signs clear to them; yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth! (5: 75).


It is clear from the historic accounts that at some point during the ministry of Jesus the Jews unbelievers of his time, threatened by his call of religious reformation and afraid of loosing their own positions in the community, planned to harm him and God made Jesus aware of his future ascension well in advance, as the Holy Quran tells us, “And (the unbelievers) plotted and planned, and God too planned, and the best of planners is God. Behold! God said: O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to myself and clear thee (of the falsehood) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee superior to those who reject faith, to the day of resurrection: then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute” (3; 54-55).

 

About the Jewish understanding of the event, “ Little is said about Jesus in the Talmud (the book containing Jewish traditions), except that he was a scholar of Joshua Ben Perachiah (who lived a century before the time assigned by the Christians for the birth of Jesus), accompanied him into Egypt, there learned magic, and was a seducer of the people, and finally put to death by being stoned and then hung as a blasphemer”, says T.W. Doane in his book “Bible Myths And Their Parallels In Other Religions, 1882”. Please note that Jews were also not clear about the manner of ‘alleged death’ of Jesus if it was secondary to stoning or hanging (or? crucifixion), they also failed to show the dead body or even the grave of Christ, which could have settled the case in their favor.

 

Paul’s imagination (?50-60 A.D) worked well in favor of crucifixion because of obvious reasons as I discussed earlier, the only thing he had to do was to add the vision of risen Christ, which he did with success but failed again to mention the most crucial evidences and those are a series of questions, “What happened to the dead body of Christ?, If he was ever buried in a grave?, If there were any other witnesses to the event of crucifixion, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?”. These questions must be a nuisance to the followers of Paul who in subsequent decades, from 80- 125 A.D wrote their respective gospels primarily addressing these questions.

 

T. W. Doane rightly remarks that, “In the first two centuries the professors of Christianity were divided into many sects, but these might all be resolved into two divisions- one consisting of Nazarenes, Ebionites and Orthodox; the others Gnostics”. Gnostics idealized the personality of Jesus to such extremes that his humanity was reduced to a Phantom without reality. They generally agreed in saying that Christ was an Aeon (in Greek Aion which means immeasurable long period of time), though they admitted the Crucifixion, considered it to have been happened in some mystical way, but denied that Christ did really die, in the literal acceptation of the term, on the cross.

 

Among the former group belonged Paul and his associates who propagated and accepted the story on literal terms as I have discussed earlier, others totally rejected the event of Crucifixion either in reality or metaphorically and are described by Irenaeus (198 A.D), who tells us about them on the authority of Polycarp, who had it from St. John himself and from the old people of Asia, that Jesus was not crucified at the time stated in the gospels but lived to be nearly fifty years old. Irenaeus also states, “They could not conceive of “the first begotten Son of God” being put to death on a cross, and suffering like an ordinary being, so they thought Simon of Cyrene must have been substituted for him, as the ram was substituted in place of Isaac” (Bible Myths and Their Parallels in Other Religions; T. W. Doane; p508-530).

 

Among all four different options about Christ’s last hours on this earth (one Jewish and three Christians), the substitution theory impressed some of our Muslim scholars too, years after the demise of our last prophet Mohammad (PBUH).

 

For me the matter is concluded in these following verses of Holy Quran which says, “That they (Jews of Talmud) said (in boast), “we killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah”- But they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the matter was made dubious to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of surety they killed him not. Nay, Allah raised him up unto himself; and Allah is exalted in power, wise” (Holy Quran 4: 157- 158).